<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Abhisit Tragedy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://khikwai.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:55:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kjf</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-9438</link>
		<dc:creator>kjf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-9438</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is Abhisit behind the police laying charges ?&quot;

I don&#039;t know, but the number of cases is up since he took over. And, as PM, he can have legislation drafted and introduced to repeal this barbaric law. Excuse me but I don&#039;t think that going on tv to lie and dissemble is very impressive on this count. By the way, about Thaksin/Samak, that&#039;s my point exactly. He is no better, no worse. Just prettier, better educated, less legitimate, weaker, and more pliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is Abhisit behind the police laying charges ?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, but the number of cases is up since he took over. And, as PM, he can have legislation drafted and introduced to repeal this barbaric law. Excuse me but I don&#8217;t think that going on tv to lie and dissemble is very impressive on this count. By the way, about Thaksin/Samak, that&#8217;s my point exactly. He is no better, no worse. Just prettier, better educated, less legitimate, weaker, and more pliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-9434</link>
		<dc:creator>boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-9434</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a bit off the mark in the comments about lese majeste - this was going on during Samak and Somchais time as PM - and during Thaksins - but you should know it has little to do with the PM -the police usually lay lese majeste charges and any thai citizen can bring  LM charges against anyone else.
Is Abhisit behind the police laying charges ?

I think you&#039;d agree that the police would be last bunch to do anything at Abhisits behest.

This is a sucker punch on your part because it is not supported by fact.

In fact Abhisit is the first politician to publicly address the issue and remark that it needs reviewing.

To say his shirt is stained with Harry the Aussie fools tears and the robhinyos blood is pretty ridiculous.
Would Thaksin or Samak have gone on CNN and taken questions about it and admitted that it happened? Never in a million years !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a bit off the mark in the comments about lese majeste &#8211; this was going on during Samak and Somchais time as PM &#8211; and during Thaksins &#8211; but you should know it has little to do with the PM -the police usually lay lese majeste charges and any thai citizen can bring  LM charges against anyone else.<br />
Is Abhisit behind the police laying charges ?</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;d agree that the police would be last bunch to do anything at Abhisits behest.</p>
<p>This is a sucker punch on your part because it is not supported by fact.</p>
<p>In fact Abhisit is the first politician to publicly address the issue and remark that it needs reviewing.</p>
<p>To say his shirt is stained with Harry the Aussie fools tears and the robhinyos blood is pretty ridiculous.<br />
Would Thaksin or Samak have gone on CNN and taken questions about it and admitted that it happened? Never in a million years !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-516</guid>
		<description>something more @ Tom: &quot;Her views as responded to by me in defence of Thais were transparently silly and are at least as racially motivated as those she complains are racially motivated because they criticise Thais.
If a person makes silly comments, it is pointless to say they have previously made some intelligent ones. No? Otherwise one is simply being personal&quot; 
So long with open mindedness: what feels silly to you doesn&#039;t necessarily have to feel silly to others. Dismissing it as &quot;silly&quot;, though, denotes a strong tinge of arrogance. As I read it, she was in no way defending the Thais, but merely stating the obvious: not all Thais are like that, and the ones who aren&#039;t are not happy to be described that way. Which, I think, is fair enough.
There&#039;s more: &quot;Did you seriously never hear of the 5 Ki’s that Thais use to describe their own people? Ki-ooat (boastful), Ki-kong (cheating), Ki-kiat (lazy), Ki-itcha (covetous) and Li-lohp (grasping). This is what Thai culture says about Thais.&quot;
I&#039;d like to point out that self-criticism is a good thing. There are many things I don&#039;t like about Thailand and the Thais, but this particular thing is good: it means people are aware of their own flaws. This, for example doesn&#039;t often happen with Northern Europeans and Americans. I love Scandinavian countries and people, for example, but some people in those countries are not exactly ready to openly identify their countries&#039; flaws. Still, I would never write such things as &quot;Scandinavians are not humble&quot;.  In other words... Tom, face it, you fucked up... apologize, it&#039;s better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>something more @ Tom: &#8220;Her views as responded to by me in defence of Thais were transparently silly and are at least as racially motivated as those she complains are racially motivated because they criticise Thais.<br />
If a person makes silly comments, it is pointless to say they have previously made some intelligent ones. No? Otherwise one is simply being personal&#8221;<br />
So long with open mindedness: what feels silly to you doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to feel silly to others. Dismissing it as &#8220;silly&#8221;, though, denotes a strong tinge of arrogance. As I read it, she was in no way defending the Thais, but merely stating the obvious: not all Thais are like that, and the ones who aren&#8217;t are not happy to be described that way. Which, I think, is fair enough.<br />
There&#8217;s more: &#8220;Did you seriously never hear of the 5 Ki’s that Thais use to describe their own people? Ki-ooat (boastful), Ki-kong (cheating), Ki-kiat (lazy), Ki-itcha (covetous) and Li-lohp (grasping). This is what Thai culture says about Thais.&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;d like to point out that self-criticism is a good thing. There are many things I don&#8217;t like about Thailand and the Thais, but this particular thing is good: it means people are aware of their own flaws. This, for example doesn&#8217;t often happen with Northern Europeans and Americans. I love Scandinavian countries and people, for example, but some people in those countries are not exactly ready to openly identify their countries&#8217; flaws. Still, I would never write such things as &#8220;Scandinavians are not humble&#8221;.  In other words&#8230; Tom, face it, you fucked up&#8230; apologize, it&#8217;s better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Tom, do you honestly think all or most Thais match with your description? And do you really think Joy doesn&#039;t have a right to feel insulted even though she knows many (not most) Thais are actually roughly similar to the characters you depicted? You know what I think? I think that by being so harsh and overly direct and prone to generalization when you voice your opinions, you&#039;re actually confirming that the many people in Thailand who match your description are not necessarily ethnical Thais: you might be one of them, for example. There&#039;s a difference between Khiikwai&#039;s article and some of the comments here: Khiikwai doesn&#039;t feel morally superior or in a cultural, moral, or even ethnical higher position, whereas some of the posters actually do. If trying to voice our honest opinions about Thailand means insulting ALL Thais, including the genuinely open-minded ones like Joy (whose posts are always great, full of good, fresh ideas, and at the same time humble and criticism-friendly), then let me strongly disagree: this is counterproductive and can only lead to bad ramifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, do you honestly think all or most Thais match with your description? And do you really think Joy doesn&#8217;t have a right to feel insulted even though she knows many (not most) Thais are actually roughly similar to the characters you depicted? You know what I think? I think that by being so harsh and overly direct and prone to generalization when you voice your opinions, you&#8217;re actually confirming that the many people in Thailand who match your description are not necessarily ethnical Thais: you might be one of them, for example. There&#8217;s a difference between Khiikwai&#8217;s article and some of the comments here: Khiikwai doesn&#8217;t feel morally superior or in a cultural, moral, or even ethnical higher position, whereas some of the posters actually do. If trying to voice our honest opinions about Thailand means insulting ALL Thais, including the genuinely open-minded ones like Joy (whose posts are always great, full of good, fresh ideas, and at the same time humble and criticism-friendly), then let me strongly disagree: this is counterproductive and can only lead to bad ramifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KWAI JOK FOONG ควายโจกฝูง</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>KWAI JOK FOONG ควายโจกฝูง</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys - I&#039;m going to shut this back and forth down, considering that it has very little at all to do with the original post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys &#8211; I&#8217;m going to shut this back and forth down, considering that it has very little at all to do with the original post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hobby</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>hobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-119</guid>
		<description>&#039;&lt;i&gt;It is you that miss the point that the attributes *do* describe Thais. If they describe others as well, then fine but that does not invalidate the points I made about Thais&lt;/i&gt;&#039;

&#039;&lt;i&gt;Status-conscious, arrogant, greedy, dishonest and uncaring&lt;/i&gt;&#039; - that sounds like my fellow countrymen, and I&#039;m not Thai.
(I&#039;m sure if my fellow countrymen were asked, many would agree about the population generally, though few would admit they have those traits personally - I will admit to personally being all five at various different times, but think only one applies to me all the time)

They also describe humans generally, Thai&#039;s are human, so what&#039;s the point?

&#039;&lt;i&gt;...yet Thais stereotype Indians as dishonest, Laotians as being stupid&lt;/i&gt;&#039;

In that one sentence you have shown how sterotyping nations is what&#039;s really stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;<i>It is you that miss the point that the attributes *do* describe Thais. If they describe others as well, then fine but that does not invalidate the points I made about Thais</i>&#8216;</p>
<p>&#8216;<i>Status-conscious, arrogant, greedy, dishonest and uncaring</i>&#8216; &#8211; that sounds like my fellow countrymen, and I&#8217;m not Thai.<br />
(I&#8217;m sure if my fellow countrymen were asked, many would agree about the population generally, though few would admit they have those traits personally &#8211; I will admit to personally being all five at various different times, but think only one applies to me all the time)</p>
<p>They also describe humans generally, Thai&#8217;s are human, so what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>&#8216;<i>&#8230;yet Thais stereotype Indians as dishonest, Laotians as being stupid</i>&#8216;</p>
<p>In that one sentence you have shown how sterotyping nations is what&#8217;s really stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longway</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>longway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Tom

There is no point singling out Thais if everyone possesses the same attributes is there? Thailand has plenty of flaws,  but I am not sure who you think you are that you can pass judgement over a large swathe of the Thai population. 

For all your talk rationality its evident you possess very little when assessing Thailand and its people.

I will let you wrestle with what I meant with the veil for ignorance observation, I think its pretty self evident myself. If you wish to be pedantic about the way I have phrased the statement then may point out I did not said that stereotyping is a substitute for ignorance, nor should it be. Which is in fact what I implied in my observation. So I cannot see the point of your little word game.

Personally I think you owe Joy an apology, I cant see anything silly about what she said and how she said it, but I see much silliness on your part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom</p>
<p>There is no point singling out Thais if everyone possesses the same attributes is there? Thailand has plenty of flaws,  but I am not sure who you think you are that you can pass judgement over a large swathe of the Thai population. </p>
<p>For all your talk rationality its evident you possess very little when assessing Thailand and its people.</p>
<p>I will let you wrestle with what I meant with the veil for ignorance observation, I think its pretty self evident myself. If you wish to be pedantic about the way I have phrased the statement then may point out I did not said that stereotyping is a substitute for ignorance, nor should it be. Which is in fact what I implied in my observation. So I cannot see the point of your little word game.</p>
<p>Personally I think you owe Joy an apology, I cant see anything silly about what she said and how she said it, but I see much silliness on your part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-117</guid>
		<description>@Doug:
Nothing personal in what I said, my criticism is of the points she makes wrongly or badly. I am sure she is everything you say she is but that is a personal assessment and one should not be personal as you rightly but irrelevantly point out. Her views as responded to by me in defence of Thais were transparently silly and are at least as racially motivated as those she complains are racially motivated because they criticise Thais.

If a person makes silly comments, it is pointless to say they have previously made some intelligent ones. No? Otherwise one is simply being personal.

@Longway:
It is you that miss the point that the attributes *do* describe Thais. If they describe others as well, then fine but that does not invalidate the points I made about Thais.

A defence in court that a robber is less culpable just because there are other robbers would probably not carry much weight. Rightly.

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Stereotyping is just a veil for ignorance.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; What does this mean? In linguistics it is called a nominalisation - usually used to appeal to emotions where the rational case is weak.

&lt;em&gt;&quot;[ignorance] serves a purpose in many situations.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Really? Perhaps it does in Thailand.

@Hobby: Please see above. 

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Doug:<br />
Nothing personal in what I said, my criticism is of the points she makes wrongly or badly. I am sure she is everything you say she is but that is a personal assessment and one should not be personal as you rightly but irrelevantly point out. Her views as responded to by me in defence of Thais were transparently silly and are at least as racially motivated as those she complains are racially motivated because they criticise Thais.</p>
<p>If a person makes silly comments, it is pointless to say they have previously made some intelligent ones. No? Otherwise one is simply being personal.</p>
<p>@Longway:<br />
It is you that miss the point that the attributes *do* describe Thais. If they describe others as well, then fine but that does not invalidate the points I made about Thais.</p>
<p>A defence in court that a robber is less culpable just because there are other robbers would probably not carry much weight. Rightly.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Stereotyping is just a veil for ignorance.&#8221;</em> What does this mean? In linguistics it is called a nominalisation &#8211; usually used to appeal to emotions where the rational case is weak.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;[ignorance] serves a purpose in many situations.&#8221;</em> Really? Perhaps it does in Thailand.</p>
<p>@Hobby: Please see above. </p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hobby</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>hobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-115</guid>
		<description>&#039;&lt;i&gt;Status-conscious, arrogant, greedy, dishonest and uncaring&lt;/i&gt;&#039;

Tom: Are you suggesting those characteristics are exclusively Thai?

I would be interested to hear your stereotype(statistics) for a few other countries - lets start with each SE Asian country, as well as USA, UK, Australia &amp; China.
After that is done, why not move on to each European country individually, then Africa and the Latin American countries. 

Will any of those 5 traits will be repeated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;<i>Status-conscious, arrogant, greedy, dishonest and uncaring</i>&#8216;</p>
<p>Tom: Are you suggesting those characteristics are exclusively Thai?</p>
<p>I would be interested to hear your stereotype(statistics) for a few other countries &#8211; lets start with each SE Asian country, as well as USA, UK, Australia &amp; China.<br />
After that is done, why not move on to each European country individually, then Africa and the Latin American countries. </p>
<p>Will any of those 5 traits will be repeated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longway</title>
		<link>http://khikwai.com/blog/2009/01/25/the-abhisit-tragedy/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>longway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://khikwai.com/blog/?p=134#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Tom: You utterly miss the point that the traits you describe are not unique to Thailand or Asia but exist in all cultures. 

The traits you describe are especially obvious in developing countries, as there is a lack of education and maturity and the rule of law is usually very lax, 

I find Thailand fairly middling in terms of its greed, corruption and vindictiveness on a global footing.

Stereotyping is just a veil for ignorance, it serves a purpose in many situations, but there is nothing particuarly clever nor attractive (though it can be funny in the right circumstances) about using this ugly episode as an opportunity to vent your hatred. 

I see you and OAH in the same light as I would see any Thai resorting to lazy stereotypes to pass high handed judgements about a peoples&#039; worth: Very childish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: You utterly miss the point that the traits you describe are not unique to Thailand or Asia but exist in all cultures. </p>
<p>The traits you describe are especially obvious in developing countries, as there is a lack of education and maturity and the rule of law is usually very lax, </p>
<p>I find Thailand fairly middling in terms of its greed, corruption and vindictiveness on a global footing.</p>
<p>Stereotyping is just a veil for ignorance, it serves a purpose in many situations, but there is nothing particuarly clever nor attractive (though it can be funny in the right circumstances) about using this ugly episode as an opportunity to vent your hatred. </p>
<p>I see you and OAH in the same light as I would see any Thai resorting to lazy stereotypes to pass high handed judgements about a peoples&#8217; worth: Very childish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

